Saturday, 30 July 2011

Movie Review: Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)




DIRECTOR: Joe Johnston
SCREENWRITER: Chistopher Markus, Stephen McFeely (based on the comic books by Jon Simon and Jack Kirby)

Normally at the end of a Marvel film in the pre-Avengers series, there is a teaser for the next instalment. Iron Man concluded with an eye-patched Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury introducing himself to Robert Downey Jr’s Tony Stark, thus setting up the arc and a subplot for Iron Man 2; Downey Jr would also cameo in The Incredible Hulk while Thor’s hammer was discovered at the end of Iron Man 2. Thor’s ending I didn’t quite get and will revisit. Captain America: The First Avenger makes the exception of having a post-credit sequence of sorts at the very start and with The Avengers movie on the horizon, we pretty much know how The First Avenger will end. But that is no hindrance is it may be the most fun and dramatic (read “tragic”) entry in the series so far, though I shall revisit all the other entries. Thor was fun (and funny) whereas Iron Man 2 (and maybe The Incredible Hulk) were more in “meh” territory.

There were a couple of things I missed such as what the power was that Yohann Schmidt/Red Skull gets hold of (something about Odin I think, which again ties into Thor) as well as what it was Captain America was given to strengthen him up. Whatever it is, it “makes good – great and bad – worst”. There is a theme of sorts of bullies standing up – the shorter and skinnier Capt. America is beaten up for asking a talker in the cinema to be quiet as he shouted over newsreel war footage. In fact the shorter and skinnier Capt. America takes getting used to at first. But it is his “weakness” that is needed for a (good) German Doctor’s experiment as he apparently has more compassion. He even tried to get into the army a few times and perhaps one could see a ‘David and Goliath’ allegory. After becoming the First Avenger, he goes through the post-transformation phase seen in 2002’s Spider-Man and 2008’s Iron Man by wearing a prototype (or two) of the costume (plus the Shield) before later donning the final version. In fact, it is here that my main gripe about the film comes in, in which Capt. America is seen in his new suit in a montage of action scenes like the film became a trailer of itself (see also Transformers: Dark of the Moon), though of course this could also be a reference to newsreel war footage (incidentally, when the monochrome footage plays in the movie theatre in the film, it is 4:3 but shown in close-up for us, it is 16:9). There is a kind of science-fictiony idea that Capt. America inspires his own real-life franchise with comics, movies and an anthem, The Star-Spangled Man (I will probably buy the soundtrack). The main science-fictiony stuff is of the retro/pulp kind with control panels, switches and most importantly of all – WW2 with lasers. If Thor would fit in a trilogy with 1977’s Star Wars and 1980’s Flash Gordon, The First Avenger could be said to go back further to the older Flash Gordons (as parodied in Star Trek: Voyager’s Captain Proton holodeck programme). Richard Armitage (Guy of Gisborne in the BBC’s Robin Hood series) gets to pilot a submarine, but unfortunately not for very long.

Another minor gripe is the apparent use of 3D (I saw it in 2D), namely a flagpole falling over, a gun being pointed and the Shield being used as a frisbee.

I started off by talking about “post-credit sequences”. Be very sure to stay until after this film. Not only is there a scene that set-ups up The Avengers, but you might well be applauding by the end.

Monday, 25 July 2011

London Film & Comic Con 2011



This was taken at my first London Film & Comic Con on Saturday 9th July 2011. This was also the year that I began posing with actors and actresses at Milton Keynes' Collectormania, which I frequented. I was blessed to have a ticket numbered in the 1-400 range, which meant that although I had to queue for a while, I got to pose with Karen Gillan - aka Amy Pond in "Doctor Who" - in the first of her two photo sessions.





Honorable mention should also go to Louise Jameson - aka Leela, also of Doctor Who fame. I had quite narrowly missed her photosession after getting a ticket (delayed train, long-but-fairly-speedy-queue to the con, wrong queue for photoshoot tickets) but I was told she might to some pick-ups later. After repeated returns (I had been told to ask) to the location of the shoot, the team managed to arrange her return and it turns out I was the only one. It was taken straight after Walter Koenig (Chekov in Star Trek) and managed to exchange more words than the usual shoots I attended.

Friday, 20 May 2011

Film: Blitz (2010)

Jason Statham is a cop with temper trouble who is teamed with a transferred officer (Paddy Considine) who was a victim of homophobia in finding a cop killer. David Morrissey is a journalist who is given leads from both the killer and Statham’s snitch. Meanwhile a female cop is post-rehab and is dealing with a youth who has ended up involved in gang violence.

Blitz has at least two failings. One being an overall televisual look (a rather ensemble piece, it is like a big screen episode of “The Bill” or a self-contained pilot for a ‘dirty cop’ series), although once it is broadcast on television, the argument could be made that it looks cinematic. It would probably better in an independent cinema as opposed to a mainstream multiplex. Or maybe I have not seen enough cop-related movies. However, “Hot Fuzz” – a pastiche and send-up of Hollywood action films – managed to look cinematic. The other failing is that at no point does Statham take off his shirt (perhaps the Kermodean litmus test of a Statham film). It also plays more as a thriller than as an action film with few action scenes for Statham to go through – namely confronting some youths in the opening, chasing a suspected cop-killer, and a final confrontation at the end. At least one scene of poignant interest is the media coverage of the first murder – a young female cop is shot point blank and reported as “dying instantly”, but we see her gasping until death.

Friday, 6 May 2011

New Blog

Long time, no see.

I've changed the blog from "Media Engagement" to a more general one, based more on myself where I will post thoughts on subjects of my interests etc.

However, this will include from time to time an attempt at bridging my faith and my big interest (movies mostly but going to expand into other media).

Tuesday, 7 April 2009

Why the new "Star Trek" movie will be... (Spoilers)

I haven't seen the new "Star Trek" film yet so of course I cannot judge it yet. My main worry about it has come from mostly positive reviews regarding (spoilers) the 'alternate timeline' plot. Now, I don't mean to come over all fanboyish, but is this the only explanation as to why everything looks different? Do we even need an explanation? Anyways, here's my expectations about why the 2009 Star Trek film will be...

a) ...Good:
Leonard Nimoy liked the script: And if you've read his autobiography 'I Am Spock' or listened to him read it on tape, you'll know his concerns for story, which I think he's really good at.

Simon Pegg is in it: Then again he was also in "Run, Fatboy, Run" (Meh) and "How to Lose Friends and Alienate People" (OK). Since this is Sci-Fi, I think it's safe to assume this is the "Shaun of the Dead"/"Hot Fuzz" Simon Pegg. Even his co-writer Edgar Wright has had a positive view of the film, hinting that it may be even better than the Star Wars prequels.

Kevin Smith gave it a 'Thumbs Up'

Positive Fan Reaction: This comes from the surprise screening and as far as I know, fan reaction to The Phantom Menace was negative, despite the hype.


b)...Bad

Alternate timeline: That is my only concern. Can you really make revive a franchise in its original 'canon', put it in an alternate timeline and still call it "Star Trek"? Isn't that the same as dumping the main cast up in space for 80 minutes while a bunch of kids fly their ships and still call it "Thunderbirds"?

Sunday, 23 November 2008

Contact is made...

Bit late (shame on me), but I sent an email to Simon Mayo's BBC Radio 5 show (the Mark Kermode film review slot), regarding a recent episode of The Culture Show showing Mark and director Bill Forsyth chatting during a public screening of Local Hero, breaking his own rule on not talking during films ("You wouldn't do it in Church").

Turns out (I listened to it later on iplayer) that Simon actually read my email out ("Joe, Film Student in Staffordshire") and Mark actually went on to admit his error and apologize! I wasn't even complaining - but I think I went mad with power!

Anyways, Mark remains my favourite critic, him and Simon being my 'Siskel and Ebert'

Thursday, 30 October 2008

My Day is Made

Woo. Haven't been here in a while. I am now doing Film Studies at University and I was surfing the Internet today (worst. pasttime. ever) and I came across this article by America's most famous film critic Roger 'Thumbs Up/Down' Ebert on Martin Scorsese's The Last Temptation of Christ (1988). I hadn't read the article in full but I recognised the name "Steven D. Greydanus" as one of the ChristianityTodayMovies gang with Jeffrey Overstreet (author of Through a Screen Darkly) and Peter T. Chattaway.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081029/REVIEWS08/810309993/1023

I informed Jeffrey of this and I come home this evening to see if anything came of it and not only did I get a RESPONSE but also this!:

http://lookingcloser.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/roger-ebert-remembers-the-last-temptation-of-christ/

All I need now is to get a career in writing and hopefully Mark Kermode will mention me and I have nothing to wait for except the Second Coming (look, I had a pint tonight, OK?).